Hi guys

I can say its all about whats deep underground. As for the majors. I will paste a tidbit from an analysts report James Darcel wrote last Nov that is really what the whole game of Ni exploration is all about. Pay attention to the first paragraph. Of course he is speaking about ISM. But in reading what he says, the whole Shaw dome is a target. Where will the present mills find and feed ore from. God imagine the JV speculations. Thats why the maps might glue some talk together.

I like the "tip of the iceberg" theories.

The methodology applied to estimating Ni at Langmuir 1 did not attempt to “fill-in” gaps in core sample data, where the summarized report excluded a length between reported samples. It is the opinion of the writer that the effect would be that Ni estimated at Langmuir 1 is low.

From the Jensen report (p.48): “Detailed mapping and interpretation indicates that both the Langmuir No.1 and No.2 deposits occur at the same stratigraphic position on opposite limbs of an anticline / syncline pair and implies that the favourable stratigraphy may be repeated at several locations on the property.” In the author’s opinion, this should be interpreted as meaning that the above Ni poundage estimates are a starting point, and that significantly more Ni is highly likely to be found at the Company’s Langmuir area properties after they drill into the 40-60 anomalies they are targeting over the next year."