If I understand this correctly the main purpose behind a Sample Size Re-Estimation Analysis "would be" to determine if BETonMACE is properly powered.  

Assuming I am correct about this, then maybe a SSRA isn't needed. 

Don sounded very confident and assured at Bloom&Burton in Toronto when he said that the trial was "properly powered".  Given the schedule 4.22 from the loan agreement, it seems to me they likely already have the data needed to make that determination thus rendering the need for a formal SSRA as being redundant.

It might also be redundant :-) 

Sorry, I can't resist repeating myself when I use the word redundant.  

If I'm right what possible purpose could a SSRA serve other than to maybe attract buyers to the stock?