I'm more prone to say I have a bug up a certain part of my anatomy....a "bee in my bonnet" sound so 1930s.

I will try not to go all OCD on this like I did before with certain other communication blunders.  But I do need to share this and solicit feedback, if there is any.

Why did Clayton Paradis leave the company?  I sent Sarah an email asking if it was a dismissal, either with or without cuase, or a resignation....or a mutually agreed upon parting of ways.  This is the answer I got.  

"Please note the company will not be commenting further".

To employ the title of a recent movie:  Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?!?!?

Commenting further???  The company never commented on it at all, except in a couple of email replies to me from Sarah.  One saying Clayton was no longer with the company and the other saying that he left in "early May".  

Now, to be clear....I was not a fan of Clayton's work.  In a phone conversation with DM I exhorted the CEO to stick his boot up Clayton's backside, and I didn't use the word backside.  But with that being said Clayton held the title of Sr VP of Investor Relations, an executive role.  He is listed as part of Resverlogix's "Stellar" Management team in Dr. Kideckle's Beacon report.  

How could his leaving the company not be considered material???  He wasn't the janitor or an IT technician working in the back room.  His job description was to act as a conduit through which the company communicated with shareholders and prospective investors.  To me its like the City of Toronto deciding to close the DVP ahead of the Monday morning commute but deciding its not worth mentioning to drivers.  

Is anyone else vexed, perterbed or curious at all about this?  If nobody cares I'll drop it....I do have some PMs going with some members and if nobody has any thoughts I'll leave it alone on the board in the future.

I've put a request in to Sarah asking to advise me of a convenient time to speak to DM, but maybe I'm the only one who really cares.