SF - After thinking about my comment this afternoon I believe I did get the number wrong. It was 86 diseases not 46. I have posted on this at least one other time in the last year so if some smart person was able review those past posts you would see a clearer picture. One of the posters on the SH board posted DMs comments from that AGM and the number of diseases that the RVX science team thought they could have a positive affect on. There was something about a number of scaffolds as well but I am now way out of my league so I will just leave it here. It would have been at least five years ago now. Whatever pharma that ends up with our technology is going make a few buckets full of money when they follow up on all the technology RVX has.

tada