It certainly appears to say that the PEA is non-compliant, which makes it much less useful. The Jan 11 press release states that it would be compliant and carried out by CWA Engineers. That may be the meaning of the phrase " internal analysis" but I don't see the point. If it's worth doing, then do it right with an independent party as originally planned. When I first read the Feb 4 press release I wondered what was the purpose since it looked like they were just stating that they would stick to the same schedule announced less than a month ago. Cedar said it should take longer to do a proper PEA then the timeline presented by PDG and maybe they realize that now. Well, let's see what the revised resource estimate reveals. If it's not an impressive number then the PEA is irrelevant anyways.