It's too early in the project to consider applying cut-offs because there's not enough information. All we can do right now is compare the intercepts with similar projects, which is probably what the market will do. I find preliminary resource estimates using limited geometry and grade data is useful to get a feel for how large the project could be . Kodiak had a history of the share price getting ahead of itself so I like to keep some rough resource numbers for share valuation.Underworld had a cut-off of 0.5 g/t for their open pit resource estimate but their strike and depth lengths were about 600 m. Premier's Hardrock resource estimate (open pit portion) was 1.1 mil oz ( 675k indicated, 425k inferred) using a conservative grade cut-off of 1 g/t. Very little of Milestone would even make it into Premier's resource estimate. Even so the cut-offs for resource estimates are usually much more conservative then a cut-off determined from an economic analysis such as a pre-feasibility study. The amount of tonnage, metallurgy, infrastructure etc. also play a role. Without question Milestone is a project worth pursuing and could develop into a company maker, but will be compared to press releases from Hardrock like 9.3 g/t over 28 m intercepts, even if those comparisons are not necessarily fair.