TODAY'S DISCOVERY, TOMORROW'S FUTURE

Creating shareholder wealth by advancing gold projects through the exploration and mine development cycle.

Free
Message: Re: Promotion vs Results
2
Jan 04, 2010 08:10AM
4
Jan 04, 2010 08:48AM
1
Jan 04, 2010 09:01AM
4
Jan 04, 2010 10:11AM

tau
Jan 04, 2010 10:19AM

Jan 04, 2010 10:36AM

Jan 04, 2010 10:50AM

Jan 04, 2010 10:57AM
1
Jan 04, 2010 12:24PM
1
Jan 04, 2010 02:33PM
5
Jan 04, 2010 03:50PM
1
Jan 04, 2010 04:00PM

Jan 04, 2010 05:58PM
3
Jan 04, 2010 09:03PM
2
Jan 04, 2010 11:40PM
3
Jan 05, 2010 09:33AM

>>Why not Promotion AND Results?<<

I absolutely agree. Some would say that for long term investors, which I think most of us are, promotion doesn't matter because the value of the company ultimately depends on whether they produce or not. HOWEVER, and this is a big however, promotion does determine where the share price is in the interim- like when they do a financing. Kodiak recently issued over 20M shares to raise $13M. Compare that to the financing in 2007 when they issued 14M shares and raised $54M- lots more money and much less dilution. The difference? The interim share price. Now I know that the first financing was done at the height of the frenzy over the GM discovery, and that the sp would naturally drift down, but I do think that more and better publicity in the meantime would have kept the share price higher than the depths to which it has sunk. Promotion costs little or nothing, but makes a big difference in how much OUR shares are diluted, how much money is raised, and how fast this company can move forward. AIMHO.

spiny


Jan 05, 2010 11:03AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply