While we're waiting for Portee to come up with the answer (I think he's fallen back on the logarithmic abacus for now - maybe his calculator's solar battery is out of power) ... I was disappointed with the uranium news, in that there's no chemistry results. However, that doesn't mean there won't be, in another news release.

They have drill cores, so they can do a chemical analysis, vs. just radiometrics. That takes time, and I did figure it would be in a second, later NR. The leve of radioactivity over background didn't impress me, but I'm not a uranium guy.

I hate to think Cameco let this property go for a good reason - I've been rooting for KXL to show them wrong. I was surprised when the press release said they had been punching holes over all of the bottom 40 - I thought they had figured out just where the yellow stuff is supposed to be, based on the good professor's noggin and the fancy diagrams we saw?

When I last talked to mgmt I was under the impression that there would be a news release for the uranium chemistry, so I'm counting on that to convince me.