Thats brilliant, thanks for the post! I'm usually pretty anal about skimming the Hercules portion of the site for updates but that completely slipped by me, good one!

So would making the assumption (if most haven't already) that Hercules should be bigger than 4.1m ounces be too optimistic? Well, with a statement like
--"shown to have a surface scale and geometry unprecedented in the Geraldton–Beardmore Gold camp’s history"--
I don't think so.
It sounds to me like they are making their best efforts to subtley hint to the shareholders that they've got the motherload. I know we're nowhere near having tonnage estimates but everytime I check back it seems like the prospect keeps getting better.

If it wasn't for these damn unstable I would be shouting from the rooftops instead of shouting curse words around the office lol. By the same token I wouldn't have been able to trade and gain a bundle shares for free so it all works out. I get to pretend I have turrets and eventually I'll be rich enough to repay all those I've offended ;)

I've got a long term outlook but right now I'm taking it one day at a time.

GLTA.
Gamblor.