I have a bit of a Jeff Goldblum-type theory about the upcoming survey (is it a mag survey, I'm not sure). I'd like to get an opinion or two if someone would be kind enough to oblige.
One thing that I see as really positive for us is the fact that they've already done so much legwork.
Since they have uncovered several veins it should give them a better indication of what success looks like on the survey. I don't know if they're doing a fly-over of the Golden Mile etc. but I would assume so.
All I know is having something for "Joe public" to measure success against (within the current geology) is going to be excellent for us. All they have to do is say they've found several more potential veins around the property. If any are similar to the existing ones, or they prove the current veins continue at depth and its game over IMO.

One of the issues with Caribou is that the VTEMs were all good in theory but obviously not in practice. All people wanted were immediate results; drill into the big pink blob and high grade nickel should pop right out.
In the end there turned out to be a million variables and I guess it wasn't that simple. I think in this case it may very well be that simple (especially if they can align existing results) but I've also learned over the years that geology is not an exact science.

I'm not a Geo by any stretch, I don't even play one on t.v(unfortunately) so I'm flying by the seat of my pants and making huge assumptions on this one. Are there any geos or more knowledgeable people that can confirm/deny my crackpot theory please?

thanks.
Gamblor.