By the way, by now some of you are looking into the VAERS database.  Theoretically, vaccine deaths and injuries must be reported.  However, there is no teeth to this, and it is entirely based on opinion.  All a doctor has to say is that he didn't believe it was an injury caused by a vaccine.  What will happen to him? Nothing whatsoever.  I have heard of an injury that seemed obvious to me, began the day of the vaccine and caused a healthy and athletic young man to be incredibly ill with myocarditis among other things.  His doctor did not report his injury (he inquired), so he ended up doing it himself.  If you think that somehow all of the injuries and deaths are being reported, you are wrong.  It is time consuming, discouraged by employers and a real chill is being felt by doctors, most of whom are employees now, who want to do so.  My husband was very careful to always report, but he is rare chap, I am thinking, who risked his job to advocate for patients.  

Just like we have seen the SEC be rendered useless by regulatory capture (the very entities they are supposed to be looking into and going after being able to offer plum jobs when they leave the SEC?), I honestly now believe something similar is happening or has happened to those agencies we now rely on by big pharma, who have total amnesty from any lawsuit for jabs, and who are making their largest profits ever.  Is that so outside the realm of possibility?  Has the government response of shutdowns and mandates been the only and wisest course of action?  Is it a good thing to have alternate voices silenced, removed from social media, threatened etc.  All I ask is that everyone actually listen carefully to both sides and make sure that the legacy media, so much of which gets a lot of its advertising money from big pharma, is telling us the whole picture.