Sorry man, your tech analysis has been of great value to the forum.  I'm not advocating for one guy vs. another guy, but the fact of the matter is you called it pathetic when he (correctly) forecasted $2. Some of your past statements include the following, of which 0% have been correct.

"Poet will be doing what it takes to get the share price higher in order for a successful listing on the NASDAQ at a share price that Institutional Funds can buy at."

"Finally going to the NASDAQ where institutional investors await."

"Do you realize that POET is going to list on the NASDAQ where the technical achievements and commercial production capabilities will be something that Institutional Investors embrance? Where analysts will look at the production capacity and the ownership of SPX and apply a value. Where large funds can inventory stock and where market makers are prepared to equate value."