Someone recently said:

".. We are close now to seeing revenues that will be growing in meaningful ways, and I wouldn't be surprised if one day someone takes apart a large tech companies' product and announces that they have found Poet tech inside it, and we'll be off to the races."

Yes, POET has done whatever it has done on a shoestring budget. Yes, these technological transformations might take time. Yes, large companies would rather not loudly promote their move to a new tech standard and then be embarassed by possible failure. All of these factors, and others, might be used to explain the slow progession of POET's technology and share price. But the reality is all of the above  coupled with the fact that the only people getting paid the last many years are traders and POET associated insiders and management.

Does anyone know who makes the fabric for Izod clothing? Or who makes the axles and transmissions for Teslas or Chevy Silverado pickup trucks? Or who provides the leather for Gucci? My point is the same as many of the other posters here....to provoke thought and discussion. My earlier posts about POET being "inside" is that for POET to become a household name, it would be nice to think that POET's logo would be splashed all over the outside of many finished products. I believe for that to happen, POET needs to explain whether they will be suppliers of commodity parts, or be manufacturers of their own finished products. I am very keen on POET being the profitable investment that I imagined years ago when I put many of my eggs in their basket. But being left outside, in the dark, without adequate investment information from the company is frustrating at least....

GO POET  !!