I am not sure that all of the posters here are familiar with "pump and dump" asset strategies. I, too, admire the Twitter based POET promotions to supplement the management's poor efforts. However, is this not at least borderline pumping?  But that is not my most important point here.... has anybody seen the actual POET products working in the wild? I would like to quote a previous poster:  "Why is it we only have 2% institutional investment when LWLG has over 20%. Is thier product superior to Poets? We don't believe so but they do have ten times the institutional holdings?"  

      I have previously asked the question about whether POET was a duck, or a wolf in ducks clothing. I personally do not know enough about the technology/fabrication side of POET to speak at it. I do believe that the data world could use such an uplifting technology.  But I pose a provacative question at the expense of ridicule: "should the less informed investors worry about the real world possibility of POET being a sham??"     After all these years of promises and machinations?

    Clifford