I wish you would stop bringing that fraudulent company up in the same breath with POET…

First, POET is run by a team of people with significant experience and industry credentials. Elizabeth Holmes had none of that…

Second, why would people with these credentials leave behind a safe and well paid position to join a start up if the start up didn't have the goods?

Third, Theranos was a private company and never went public. The only people that had any view of their data were early stage investors, obviously without numbers blessed by SEC reporting standards.

POET also has scores of patents, and has demonstrated its technology in public. What else needs to be said?