I believe that macroeconomic conditions affect our stock price, and Lightwave Logic obviously is a meme stock so for those who like to compare, it isn't an apples to apples comparison.

I believe POET's main priority should always remain technology development. I think they're doing pretty well in a very short period of time. 800G and clear path to 1.6T/s on the way. Very good! POET still has a lot of work to do and I think that's a good thing. They have large markets to serve and many applications to develop. Valuations would certainly be a lot lower if they focused only on datacom or were limited to developing datacom applications. Q. When can we expect the results of the feasibility study?

I believe that for now, the focus should be on attracting more customers and institutions. We, retail investors, we'll make a lot of money on this eventually, but not because of ourselves but because of ownership stake in POET held by large financial organizations, pension funds or endowments. I do like the fact that POET is gaining more attention of institutions, now holding 2.6% of the company.

I believe in marketing strategy. Q. I'm trying to figure out why they chose Northern Equities.... very strange company.

I believe insider buying is a positive sign. Q. Why isn’t there more insider buying? The management itself does not seem too interested in investing in POET.

I believe in transparancy. Our technology is well explained and we get updates frequently so I think that’s very nice. Q. Why do they use these vague projections? "year 1, year 2, year 3", "3-yr rev projection", "market share estimates in each segment ranging at the highest estimate from 18% to 30%", "committed, contracted, enagaged", "company A, company B, company C,...", "$250M+ annually, >$250M+ annually,...", ">$1 Billion Annual Revenue Potential".