Seriously the cases put forward are far more than rumour. They are intelligent and well grounded. Nobody is stating them as fact either.  Your stance suggests no one can use available the information and make a reasonable judgement. So unless it’s fact it means nothing or is worthless. In such a scenario we might as well get rid of intelligent debate or a whole history of science. Aristotle, Plato, Socrates, Kant, Nietzsche, Archimedes, Newton, Galileo, Copernicus, Einstein. All have something in common. They took available information or fact and hypothesised. I’m not saying FJs or Ozs thoughts are on their level (forgive me both). But people should be able to think outside the box within reason.