During Suresh's presentation to shareholders at the last AGM, he said that the InP platform is where POET can sell integrated products and discrete products of which both will provide value to the industry and thus POET. I get the impression that profit would be much less in discrete InP products, but very favourable in integrated InP products. I get the inference that integrated InP products is where POET wants to go, but they will also sell discrete InP products if they must (but the tone of his voice seemed less enthusiastic in that part of the spectrum). So essentially, I get what you are saying Fairchijisback as you were able to describe things much clearer technically. Thank you. 

Regardless, POET has products, product streams and thus revenue paths to support their revenue projections which is good.

Suresh also mentioned that POET would seek partners in both platforms. So, in the InP platform, there would be areas where licensing or guarded agreements would have to be made. 

My question to this forum moving forward is how much of what POET plans to do can they entirely keep to themselves?

Monolithic