Yes ITTR absolutely, persentages when you're considering millions/billions do make a considerable difference, what I was asking is why this thread has any relivence to its original intent? 

Paraphrasing: the "subjected reason" they "ditched GaAS" was to avoid paying UCONN royalties  for the efforts they provided to get the technology going in the first place. 

Giving up 3% to keep 97% in my humble opinion is nothing if the launch to a distruptive technology started by UCONN hosting the lab fundamentals. 

Thank you INTR for you post but my question still stands, I don't see the point in this thread. 

60Bowtie