Sorry FJ your post sureky deserves our attention.

I get what your saying, but I'm just being somewhat thick here as to the rational behind it.  My earlier point about this company's latency is I feel on the same line.  

They, the company, are working to a scheduled plan as regards PR which is all about approaching an 'inflection point' which was why Sheldon was brought in, inorder to create the response necessary that would get this company properly noticed and recognised for its achievements.  I would imagine this would occur when the prototypes are ready with the performance envelope known.  Considering the detectors ability this should be impressive.  Given that the integration MS was achieved in January, sufficient time has passed during a time when a more rapid turnaround can be achieved to reach the deired performance.  We must therefore be there or there abouts. Is this what is leaking out of Singapore perhaps?  

Because the decision that something is material information is linear in time, they can justly say no materiel change until the point they chose to fire the gun.  Your examples show that 'at this time' is accepted by IIROC.

We are teetering on the verge of an event which will vindicate this company's strategy and put smiles back on gloomy faces.

We are lucky to have your knowledge and experience of these juniour markets and I for one are very grateful that you continue to put up with so much flack to keep us informed with your DD.  I shall in due course share a bottle of Penderyn Welsh Whisky as the time approaches when I may actually be able to afford it.

Cheers old friend

sula