Aiming to become the global leader in chip-scale photonic solutions by deploying Optical Interposer technology to enable the seamless integration of electronics and photonics for a broad range of vertical market applications

Free
Message: re: 44-101 vs 45-106
20
Aug 01, 2015 08:44AM
2
Aug 01, 2015 08:47AM
9
Aug 01, 2015 09:12AM
4
Aug 01, 2015 09:42AM
21
Aug 01, 2015 10:03AM
3
Aug 01, 2015 10:11AM
1
Aug 01, 2015 10:23AM
14
Aug 01, 2015 10:28AM
3
Aug 01, 2015 10:29AM
8
Aug 01, 2015 10:40AM
2
Aug 01, 2015 10:49AM
2
Aug 01, 2015 10:52AM
2
Aug 01, 2015 11:05AM
15
Aug 01, 2015 11:17AM
4
Aug 01, 2015 12:15PM
17
Aug 01, 2015 12:34PM
5
Aug 01, 2015 12:38PM
32
Aug 01, 2015 01:05PM
21
Aug 01, 2015 01:15PM
9
Aug 01, 2015 01:31PM
4
Aug 01, 2015 01:59PM
1
Aug 01, 2015 02:08PM
7
Aug 02, 2015 02:48PM

maybe I'm dense, but I don't think your post got the attention it deserves.

your thinking is that, if this was "just" a PP, we'd have seen a 45-106 filing, yes?

instead, it's 44-101.

something motivated the choice of one over the other.

i.e., what can I do with a 44-101 that I can't do with a 45-106?

or is it simply six-of-one, half-dozen of the other.

that's the thing stuck in my craw at the moment.

I predict a "catch-up" week, as well as a ketchup week.

("anticipaaaaaaaaation...")

GLAL,

R.

11
Aug 03, 2015 01:10PM
2
Aug 03, 2015 01:11PM
1
Aug 03, 2015 01:14PM
2
Aug 03, 2015 01:18PM
14
Aug 03, 2015 01:37PM
4
Aug 03, 2015 02:02PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply