I favor Rainer's decision on the discussion.

I don't mind reading the negative or misconstrued posts such as the "options" one, only to have it corrected by someone well versed like FJ and others.

This shows that we should be patient and not jump to conclusions on the first mention of something negative. It keeps us grounded and makes for interesting reading in the follow up comments. When I see something proved wrong by an educated mind on this board, it builds confidence both in this board and the stock.

What I think takes away from the board is the back and forth arguments unrelated to the stock, but related to removal of a post that could better be done in private messages. This clutters the board with unsubstantial debate rather than valuable information.