Maestrodrumboe: For that exact reason, I (and I'm assuming many other PTK investors), refrain from posting on this Board, for the fear of being attacked for expressing an honest opinion.

Judging from PMs I received, you are not alone. On the other hand, judging from how many thumbs certain posts receive, a majority here is in favor of censorship.

Oh, and please don't get me wrong! I am also pro banning people who are bashing or pushing the stock without being able to bring forward proper arguments, see Rule 5 of the Six Rules Of Use.

However, if someone can justify his reasoning according to a recognized paradigm like fundamental analysis or technical analysis, that's fine for me, even if I don't agree with the paradigm or the outcome.

Sometimes someone is plain wrong, because he is mis- or underinformed. Can happen, can be fixed. As long as the person is honest, it's fine for me.

Only if someone brings forward an already rebutted case again and again, he'd fall prey to Rule 5 of the Six Rules Of Use, might have a hidden agenda and would qualify for being banned.

I believe the Six Rules Of Use are sufficient to maintain a healthy discussion. We don't need additional rules. We don't need censorship. We don't need a pre-crime department.