My wife and I attended the Easter Service at the medieval Cathedral at Chester today. The offertory Prayer was St Mathew (5.16). If it were not for the uplifting and intensly spiritual nature of the moment the prayer may have been said for Geoffrey Taylor's POET:

'Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works and glorify your father which is in heaven'.

Amen I hear you say.

Easter blessings over, my premise for part four takes up Iamsorry's excellent analysis. Like IAS I am puzzled at the need for the company to announce on two separate occasions a collaboration with BAE.

I rather fancy that we here have been diverted by the significance of the inclusion of Tony Blevins in the TRAB. Important though that is, let's try a little mind game, I want you to erase all previous knowledge or data concerning BAE's relationship with PTK or OPEL from your mind. Instead imagine the recent news relase as an entirely virgin event. We would see it as absolute confirmation of POET's viability as a process, proved at a world leaders fabrication facilities, one with a history in GaAs manufacturing to the highest order of military specifications laid out by a quality conscious Government approved facility. We should all be mind bogglingly extatic at that news but instead we seem to have become complacent about BAE role with POET. Dare I say too focused on playing with the big boys,which by the way I am now sure we are.

Let me spell it out more loudly last week's announcement is a ringing endorsement of the highest order of the POET process and herelds the military and commercial approbation of POWERED by POET products.

As IAS alluded in his post, the next announcement, which was in fact heralded in last week's NR, will be of earnings we actually expected in the final QR of 2015.

I propose that all the factors are now in place that we have all deemed as necessary to propel the SP forward to the NASDAQ: .A proven product, a proven fabrication process, the real prospect of commercial partnerships and most importantly, if I am correct in my premise, INCOME. Somehow I/we confused the BNN questions re PC earnings with personal income not company REVENUE.

PC was quite clear with his CIC audience that he was quite conservative and would not make a move to the NASDAQ until he had all factors in place.

OUR SUN IS RISING PART FOUR says PC has all in place - we are on the way to the NASDAQ.

sula