Rainer wrote: I beg to disagree. I am a real and sincere long, but I would never want to be caught in the trap of this sort of cognitive dissonance where you blank out anything negative and stop to see reality as it is. Unfortunately there's a tendency on this forum sometimes to right away condemn potential negatives instead of discussing them unemotionally (and perhaps explain them for the n-th time to a newbie).

Thank you Rainer, I accept your view with upmost respect. Nobody would argue about the importance of early warnings & signs i.e. receiving news that may potentially save one from financial harm. That with adequate time, the information may be diseminated (or spread) amongst our members in order for confirmation of fact, myth or fear mongering.

I tend to think outside the box but agree with "explaining for the n-th time to a newbie" and I'm all good with that. Information even though constantly repeated is appreciated, because fact, truth and information as accurately humanly possible is what this forum should stand for.

Sadly we've been brought in a society that tolerates non-conforming behaviour. As an example when some drunken fool stumbles and breaks your most precious heirloom, as an example a table lamp, we are conditioned to say, "that's alright". Call me an insensitive bastard, but I am planning for the first opportunity to take him outside and give him some good old fashioned swamp love! The Champ style!

Cheers! BlackToad