Green88: I think a more measured effort should be made, as Rainer suggested. If we edit the contents, protected from deletion under his account, and refine it to project a polished view of the technology first and then the company as well, It would stand a much better chance of surviving as well as be a source of information to all those that will be in search of more information in the future.

And we shouldn't set ourselves under pressure to have something delivered in a day or two – or in a week or two. This is a huge effort and we are doing this in our spare time, so we can expect this to take weeks, if not months. Especially the technology stuff will be difficult, because it will be next to impossible to find sources which are not too close to the company.

However, time may actually play into our cards, because we will have much more evidence for the existence and the functioning of the technology when partners/customers (not only PTI itself) make announcements abouthaving entered a cooperation, having licensed the TDK, or whatever else might count as evidence. And I'd like to stress again that a third-party affirmation is essential, not just a POET Technologies news release about a third-party validation.

So please don't be discouraged about this negative experience! This is the way it goes on Wikipedia. ;-)