It appears I have struck a nerve here. Lest we clarify, the reason for my comments in the opening stanza of my first post were simply to have those who think they have "game", re-examine themselves, their content and push it up a notch or two to match the team leaders.

In any team, business management, sports, or even the POET Agoracom Team, there are 1, 2,3,4,5 or more (as in the case of the 1980's Edmonton Oilers) stars that act as beacons, and leaders in the fight for better, and more accurate information. We follow and trust them because of their ease of grasp of things related, their depth of knowledge and their opinions, being stong or weak, pro or con.

There are some on here who coast on coat tails which is entirely fine, but dont expect peer respect if you consistently whoa is me, whee is me, or other delicate inference unrelated to the overall topics under discussion.

You have here a great board and leadership of that board in most cases. Keep it that way by always pushing for the best and not the most convenient. Respect the bullishness of the situation and the belief (Long held) in the company by your leaders.

This is all I will say on the matter. Now lets get back to the main subject of discussion.