I'm quoting from Oogee.... "We have no SRP, we have retail investors who would secure a profit at a lower price than you would like, and the company does NOT hold enough shares to defend a hostile takeover."

Unless something has changed since the last time I PM'd Chris Chu about possible takeovers, there cannot be a hostile takeover.

Poet has a poison pill of "voting-but-non-monetary-shares" to secure the vote. I presume that vote, however, could also be used to vote "for" a takeover.

I'd appreciate clarification if I have this wrong.