Aiming to become the global leader in chip-scale photonic solutions by deploying Optical Interposer technology to enable the seamless integration of electronics and photonics for a broad range of vertical market applications

Free
Message: Re: 20 nm vs 100 nm monolithic???
21
May 20, 2014 03:17PM
8
May 20, 2014 03:22PM
4
May 20, 2014 03:37PM
3
May 20, 2014 03:47PM
6
May 20, 2014 03:48PM
3
May 20, 2014 03:50PM
1
May 20, 2014 03:50PM
6
May 20, 2014 03:56PM
6
May 20, 2014 04:01PM
3
May 20, 2014 04:08PM
17
May 20, 2014 08:04PM
8
May 20, 2014 08:13PM
15
May 20, 2014 10:21PM
3
May 21, 2014 03:59AM
3
May 21, 2014 06:11AM
3
May 21, 2014 07:03AM

May 21, 2014 07:39AM

May 21, 2014 07:45AM
5
May 21, 2014 07:48AM
1
May 21, 2014 08:03AM

Bluecollardollar: The transistors are 100nm so are 5 times larger than 20nm but should have a higher performance than the smaller ones and produce less heat.

To make this more clear, Bluecollardollar is comparing 100 nm POET chips to 20 nm silicon chips here, not 100 nm POET chips to 20 nm POET chips – at least I hope so.

20 nm POET chips should be again faster and less power consuming than 100 nm POET chips, but this is something for the years (decades?) to come. Today there is no 20 nm POET chip. In fact, we are even still waiting for the 100 nm POET chip to be announced.

Andrea ("Powered by POET")

9
May 21, 2014 09:58AM
6
May 21, 2014 10:00AM
5
May 21, 2014 10:03AM
7
May 21, 2014 10:04AM
8
May 21, 2014 10:06AM
7
May 21, 2014 10:15AM
15
May 21, 2014 10:20AM
23
May 21, 2014 10:27AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply