Hello folks. Happy Mother's Day to all of the mothers reading this board. I have a few questions regarding the disclosure of Pelegrino 2.0. I was told at EC that, then OPL, was forced to release P1. Can those in the know please tell me under what circumstances the company was forced to disclose the report and why it was so heavily redacted. If that is the case, wouldn't P2 be a "for eyes only" document that would be used internally for negotiation purposes with a potential suitor. I would think that, if the company did not originally want P1 released to the public would P2 not be the same. That said, although we are all salivating to see P2, what is the likelihood that the report may not be released publicly and used as leverage tool for a liquidation event. Thank you. Derek.