If one can equate Dr. Taylors standards to those of the industry (i.e. acceptance that this could in fact commercially work), then I clearly agree with not confirming milestone completions. That said, I’m not saying that I’m happy about it.

However, if management were to go ahead and state that milestones were in fact complete, and thereafter go to industry and seek a deal, industry would revert back and say "show me that it's repeatable and we have a deal". This means that without repeatability we don't have a product...and if milestones were to be announced prematurely.....and a significant time lag were to occur subsequently....the stock would turn into nothing more than a pump and dump while losing credibility of its true potential.

To be clear, I’m not saying that discussions behind the scenes can’t be taking place without this. Also, recent hiring’s of POET Tech. seem to indicate that they are close to creating a sellable product.

Here’s to hoping that we get some form of clarification from the Co. directly and SOON. As I've said before, no update prior to year end is unacceptable!

In terms of what was stated by CC, I personally don't see this as positive or negative as the msg can be perceived as being either positive or negative depending on how it's read. After all, CC is legally bound not to provide ANYONE with insider material information.