We seem to have gotten the impression from management, often off the record that Falls creek was going to equate with Geodex's Sisson Brook for grade and tonnage. The assays (or I should say analyses as these numbers don't qualify as assays) are an order of magnitude lower than economic amounts.

Maybe the clue is in the fact that they quoted ppm rather than % for the W and Mo. I wonder if somebody didn't make a mistake in translating ppm to % by misplacing a decimal point - it's not the first time that has happened.