The following taken out of Rose's posting at 10:37.
<
like you to consider the underneath:
this was written in the G&M

"In exchange for its services, Agoracom collected a monthly fee and stock options in each of the companies it represented, the OSC said, and the stock options were equal to 250,000 shares or 0.5 per cent of the firm's stock. The OSC alleged Agoracom stood to gain from the online postings, since they could induce other clients to sign up, and to increase the value of its own options. “Neither the public users nor Agoracom's clients were aware that representatives of Agoracom were posting on their hubs using aliases,” the OSC alleged in the documents. “In fact, [Agoracom] knowingly deceived clients about the traffic and activity generated on their hubs.”
>
So Agoracom can not post anything positive about a company if it owns that company's stock and stands to gain from such posts?
That must mean that I also can not post anything about companies I own stocks in. Whether I admit I AM BIASED or not. Lol.

So the OSC must think that people on the internet that read these forums are complete idiots and follow, like lemmings over a cliff, any comments that are posted.

This is preposterous and insulting.