HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Question regarding institutional buying criteria

Question regarding institutional buying criteria

posted on May 05, 2008 08:38AM

Thought I would pose this question on the OT hub as to not clog up the main board.

Although I don't own any mutual funds, I seem to recall reading a prospectus for one years ago and one of the criteria for the portfolio was that a NI 43-101 must be in place in order for a company to be included in that fund.

Is it a correct assumption that many(some) fund managers can't add a company to their portfolio untill a NI43-101 is completed?

If this assumption is correct, my thinking is that the statement Richard made March 17 “Another six holes and we’ll give it to engineering to work up a 43-101 resource.” plus the fact that these 6 holes are part of the upcoming SGS assay results would/could/should open Noront up to some real nice institutional buying pressure?

Past experience has shown me that Institutional buying pressure tends drive SP much higher/faster than retail buying so in my mind right now this DE1 43-101 takes on a whole new level of importance.

Just thinking outloud really....appreciate any thoughts you may have on the whole institutional buying issue.

Cheers

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply