HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: WSR: Indigenous Homework and Community Engagement..Get Involved

I found from timeline 27:45 - End the most informative....Take away here is a call for communities in the north to get involved so they can better understand the complexities behind the EA for the Webequie Supply Road. Make sense...The same should holds true for the N/S road as well. Atleast this way they can avoid any misinformation being circulated between communities and with active Indigenous participation come to a better understanding of the safeguards being put in place to avoid, or minimize, the effects of much needed development in the area. I think between Indigenous knowledge and the application of the modern science behind ESG the Ring of Fire can move forward without all the doom and gloom being spewed by those seeking to manipulate the truth with false, or baseless, naratives.

Again, in asking about "Whose buying shares?" in Noront one must also look at those First Nations who have the most to gain by controlling the current Ring of Fire situation, and whether or not they just happen to own shares in the company; IMO. I can't help but think that they may be using this opposition to their unfair advantage that almost seems condoned by Webequie and Marten Falls; no counter. Not only is this being done as a way to force the government's hand in giving them what they want, but so too could it be used as a way of improving their own positions as potential stockholders; Chief reason. If such a question of, "Whose buying?" should be asked then IMO investigating whether, or NOT, First Nations are unfairly reaping from the benefit of their own opposition also need be asked. If such a scenario exists than theoretically could it not be used as evidence in court should they ever wish to persue legally stopping the Ring of Fire?...An unfortunately inevitability which I can see down the road if Dr. Forrest, or our government, is unsuccessful with future negotiations...

The question: Do those in opposition have a right to veto a resource development that is of National Significance? Even if it is done to the highest of ESG Standards.

We will have either peace, or war, with the First Nations once we March onward....Pardon the expression. 

 

TM.

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply