Free, Prior and Informed Consent....From Whom?
posted on
Nov 16, 2021 10:44PM
NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)
Let's talk about the Ring of Fire....Is it Matawa or Mushkegowuk who Noront has to consult with and get approval from? or Both? ....AND...Why is that some First Nations want others to consult with them yet when they have projects in their own jurisdicitions they don't feel the need to consult with anyone at all....Seems unfair how some First Nations feel they can just veto the projects of other fellow First Nations, but then quietly venture with mining companies on their own lands looking to do the same. Strange how the other First Nations don't bother complaining, interfering, or asking any questions. Why is that?
Case in point....Where was this Free, Prior and Informed Consent when Attawapiskat formed their agreement with De Beer's to open the Victor Mine in Mushkegowuk Territory years ago, and what about the silent agreement Neskantaga still has with Northern Superior Resources in Matawa Territory...Did they ever ask for Free, Prior and Informed Consent from the other First Nations that are within 100+km from their projects?...I don't think so...Nor were the mining companies involved asked to do so either...It was simply an agreement between the local First Nation and the mining company... That was all....But now somehow Noront wants to open one mine in the Ring of Fire and you have to go 100+km one way, and 100+km the other just to get your neighbours blessing knowing full well they would not even think about doing the same....
Again...The hypocrisy just does not stop....Yet those that speak are very careful about what they say, so as to not upset the others, because they know full well who they are talking to, and that respecting each others jurisdictions is expected of them...That is the First Nations way. But proving each others claim over the Ring of Fire may present to be more difficult amongst themselves. Especially in a court of law. That much I would really like to see happen, along with the fallout of those who challenge one another. Convincing the rest of Ontario, and Canada, that they need your consent is one thing, but laying claim on another First Nation's land is another.
Walking and talking carefully is my only suggestion.
TM.
From: Charles Hookimaw, Member of Attawapiskat (Kattawapiskak) First Nation
Date: November 10, 2021
A recent op-ed in The Sudbury Star said there needs to be a better approach on green energy projects from Canada and Ontario, also from the mining industry. However, the views, purported facts and opinions expressed by the columnist are insulting, one-sided, narrow-minded, and misleading.
The columnist has no understanding of our history, culture, and the significance in and around the so-called “Ring of Fire” where we have strong ties to the Land. Our past and current land-users (hunters), Elders, and KattawapiskaK people continue to harvest and live-off upstream of the Attawapiskat River and within our watershed.
The community members who continue to harvest 150 miles upriver, in an area known as Little-Attawapiskat River (not Muketei River). This is an area of the river that branches off into the Ring of Fire mining claims, the Attawapiskat River, Misissa Lake, and beyond. Members also used this land to travel throughout the James Bay coast and inland areas. This is just the tip of the land where the Kattawapiskak Cree People have and will continue to harvest and practice their way of life.
As stewards of the Land, we as the Kattawapiskak Cree People have a duty, as well as inherent and title rights to our Traditional Homelands. This duty, our culture and way of life will not change – it will be passed down as our past and current Elders have done for years.
Ongoing colonial attitudes are perpetuated by comments like we “have no legitimate claims on the traditional territories in the region “. It concerns me to hear such comments being made, that question our origins, where we harvest, and whether we have never been upriver to practice our way of life. Making these statements is not only misleading to the public but insulting to the Kattawapiskak Cree People. And I take that to heart.
The allegation that opposition to the Ring of Fire is being led by “environmental NGOs and a cadre of left-leaning lawyers,” is also false. A decision to challenge any proposed permits, or proposed exploration projects is the voices of our community and elected First Nation officials. We have a right to protect and defend our homelands, violated by the mining industry, and for this message to be amplified by our allies.
Before any proposed exploration projects and mining claims can be decided in the Traditional Territory of the Attawapiskat First Nation, they must first receive our Free, Prior and Informed Consent.