Re: Message....... from Phil Fountaine 5 Years Ago
in response to
by
posted on
Oct 31, 2018 12:49AM
NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)
I am assuming that Rickford's comments about a "corridor to prosperity" to the Ring of Fire includes talking to the First Nations of Matawa about establishing partnerships, and agreements. Phil Fountaine's advice to the mining industry, and the levels of government, has not changed since speaking about it 5 years ago. By now everyone should know what needs to be done. Those First Nations who are willing to allow responsible development in their traditional territories must be made more inclusive partners. My feeling is that this will be Noront's next step, and that by doing so the government will be able to release the funds necessary to move the Eagles Nest project, and others in the Ring of Fire, forward. This IMO is the only way to de-risk the region and move our share price upward. By making sure First Nation involvement, and indecisiveness, is no longer a question.
Article Origin
Windspeaker Publication
http://ammsa.com/publications/windspeaker/mining-industry-can-anticipate-conflict-first-nations-unless-changes-made
Author
Compiled by Debora Steel
Volume
31
Issue
4
Year
2013
The mining industry can anticipate conflict with First Nations in the Ring of Fire region of Ontario if companies play by “old rules” and attempt to impose their will on communities, said Phil Fontaine, former Assembly of First Nations national chief. “Resource interests should strive to negotiate with First Nations up front instead of the way it was done in the past, as an afterthought,” Fontaine told a crowd attending the Big Event mining expo in Timmins in June. Fontaine said the discovery of the Ring of Fire was greeted with “great excitement” about the “significant possibilities” for this region. But then there were concerns about traplines, traditional hunting grounds and land rights. So there are no guarantees that any community would say yes to all development. “Every community has a right to say no, just as they have a right to say yes. It would be unreasonable to think that they would say yes (to proposed developments) all the time.” But that doesn’t mean First Nations are against all development. “It’s incumbent upon both parties to come together ... to talk about why the position may be no at this stage and how it can become yes. First Nation people are not anti-development. They are very much pro-development, in favour of pure responsible development.”
TM.