Trump got it right?
posted on
Mar 09, 2018 06:18PM
NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)
The articles below sound good for base metals and especially the ring metals and the future production of ferrochrome in Canada. A nice neat secure supply of needed steel to the US especially if there were a war declared that disrupted the supply of steel to the US. It is not that often that I see an article in Canadian mainstream media that praises Trump for his actions. The Financial Post seems the think he made the right move on a national security level and this will benefit Canada as well as our pretty little penny stock that could supply America with the needed chromite for its military needs.
March 9, 2018
8:39 AM EST
President Trump’s decision to apply steep tariffs to steel imports on grounds of national security met with a loud chorus of protests at home and abroad, by many trying to divine what could possibly be going through Trump’s mind. Trump is an economic illiterate, he’s a protectionist, some reasoned; he’s targeting Canada to get concessions on NAFTA, he’s playing to his base, others pronounced.
These explanations miss the mark. Though Trump doubtless sees taunting Canada on NAFTA and playing to his political base as furthering his agenda, these are but freebies, sideshows to the main event. Trump is acting sincerely, and legitimately, in the national security interests of the United States. Canada isn’t his target; China is.
Trump is old enough to know that during the Korean War, president Harry Truman seized the U.S. steel industry to maintain production for America’s then-vulnerable wartime economy. During the Second World War, when the U.S. dominated the world’s steel production, rationing was nevertheless needed — the public was even exhorted to donate their automobile bumpers to the war effort as scrap steel.
Today, the U.S. has not only lost much of its steel capacity, it’s at risk of losing the balance, making it dependent on a host of countries: Canada, its largest and most reliable foreign supplier, meets just five per cent of U.S. needs. According to the U.S. Commerce Department, the United States is now at risk of finding itself “in a position where it is unable to be certain it could meet demands for national defense and critical industries in a national emergency.” If dependent on a foreign country, the department warns, the U.S. would not have the legal authority to commandeer supplies as it could within the U.S.
“Our steel industry is in bad shape,” Trump tweeted. “IF YOU DON’T HAVE STEEL, YOU DON’T HAVE A COUNTRY!”
Those who believe war is for the history books, never to inconvenience us in our daily comforts, naturally view Trump as some kind of madman, senselessly protecting a few steelworkers in an economically irrelevant industry at a great cost to the rest of the labour force and economy. But those with a longer time frame and a sense of history — and especially those who can sense the gathering storm of war — make different calculations.
Trump, like president Ronald Reagan before him, believes in peace through strength. He wants a military so dominant, and an economy so robust, that no adversary would ever dare challenge it. At the same time, Trump wants to take on today’s Evil Empire, the country that represents a future existential threat to the U.S. — China. An uncompromising ally in this project to neuter China — a man Trump calls a visionary — is Peter Navarro, his chief trade adviser, formerly a professor of economic and public policy at University of California and the author of Deathby China, a 2011 book that warns, “China’s perverse form of capitalism combines illegal mercantilist and protectionist weapons to pick off American industries, job by job. China’s emboldened military is racing towards head-on confrontation with the U.S.” Navarro’s other China book, The Coming China Wars published in 2006, described China as a ruthless emerging power likely to succeed in its ambitions of dominance.
Trump, like president Ronald Reagan before him, believes in peace through strength
The Trump-Navarro policy of confronting China through tariffs on grounds of national security is not a cynical excuse to justify protectionism. It reflects profound alarm over America’s preparedness in confronting a China that through government subsidies has acquired a stranglehold over the global steel industry: China now accounts for half of the world’s entire steel production. Without countering foreign steel subsidies in general and those from China in particular, the U.S. steel industry will be unable to survive.
The world’s steel exporters will doubtless challenge Trump’s claim that he’s acting in the interest of national security before the WTO. They will need to wait in line: The U.S. currently has 169 antidumping and countervailing duty orders in place on steel, 29 of them against China, along with 25 ongoing investigations. And the world’s steel exporters should also be prepared to lose. Under WTO rules, national security is a valid ground for levying tariffs and both the U.S. Commerce Department and the U.S. Department of Defence agree that national security is at stake.
Those who see Trump as threatening a free market in steel should see the world as it really is and welcome, rather than berate Trump’s initiative. He is now the world’s best hope — perhaps only hope — for bringing a semblance of free-market discipline to the global steel industry.
======================================================
https://www.sootoday.com/local-news/steel-tariff-battle-isnt-over-yet-sault-leaders-warn-857823
Notwithstanding today's decision temporarily relieving Canada from U.S. steel tariffs, Sault politicians are pledging to stand firm to ensure the exemption becomes permanent.
"We'll continue to make the case that Canadian steel is important to the U.S. market and U.S. supply chain," Mayor Christian Provenzano told SooToday after U.S. president Donald Trump announced that Canada and Mexico will be the only two countries exempted from the 25 per cent steel import tariff he slapped on all other nations.
Mayor Provenzano thanked Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for helping the Sault stand up for Canadian steel.
"We think in light of the facts, and the reality that Canada and the U.S. share an integrated and balanced relationship in steel, exempting Canada is the most reasonable force of action," the mayor said.
President Trump made no direct connection today between Canada's tariff exemption and the ongoing North American Free Trade Agreement negotiations, but he did mention the NAFTA talks, more or less in the same breath.
''If we don't make the deal on NAFTA, and if we terminate NAFTA.. we'll start all over again. Or we'll just do it a different way. But we'll terminate NAFTA, and that'll be it. But I have a feeling we're gonna make a deal on NAFTA... If we do there won't be any tariffs on Canada, and there won't be any tariffs on Mexico,'' the president told reporters at the White House.
Kalyan Ghosh, Algoma
"We are strong advocates for fair trade," said Kalyan Ghosh, chief executive officer of Essar Steel Algoma Inc.
"Today's announcement excluding Canada from the Section 232 tariff recognizes the importance of our trade relationship with the U.S. and ensures our highly integrated supply chain can continue unimpeded," Ghosh said.
"These developments also reinforce the need for modernization of the trade remedy system here in Canada to address the risk of unfairly diverted steel tons into our domestic market."
"We will continue to advocate for a timely resolution with the steel caucus and the federal government," the Algoma CEO said.
Terry Sheehan, MP
Sault MP Terry Sheehan said that any attempt to reintroduce tariffs into the North America Free Trade Agreement talks would be unacceptable.
"It is imperative that we remain vigilant," Sheehan said in a written statement. "We must continue to hold the line, so that Canada remains excluded from these tariffs permanently."
"Canada has been, and always will be, a safe and secure supplier of steel for the U.S, which makes the claim that a tariff should be imposed based on 'national security concerns' entirely inappropriate," the MP said.
"I conclude that Canada and Mexico present a special case," the president said in his proclamation on steel imports signed today:
Trump's proclamation cited the following factors as influencing his decision to indefinitely exempt Canadian steel from the 25 per cent tariff:
"I have determined that the necessary and appropriate means to address the threat to the national security posed by imports of steel articles from Canada and Mexico is to continue ongoing discussions with these countries and to exempt steel articles imports from these countries from the tariff, at least at this time," the president said. "I expect that Canada and Mexico will take action to prevent transshipment of steel articles through Canada and Mexico to the United States."
Ross Romano, MPP
"This announcement is a great step towards protecting jobs within the industry and within our community of Sault Ste. Marie," said Sault MPP Ross Romano, who last week urged diplomacy and negotiations instead of retaliatory measures again the Trump steel tariffs.
"I want to take this opportunity to thank Mayor Christian Provenzano and Member of Parliament Terry Sheehan for recognizing the importance of the need for diplomacy during the past week. It was very reassuring to have their support and a great sign of what we can achieve when we work together towards a common goal, regardless of our political stripes."
"The people of Sault Ste. Marie should be proud to have our political representatives at all levels of government rowing in the same direction," Romano said.
Wayne Schmidt, Michigan State Senator
The MPP also extended appreciation to Michigan State Senator Wayne Schmidt.
"I want the people of Sault Ste. Marie to know how instrumental Senator Schmidt has been this past week. From our first conversation and many since then, he and I have maintained great communication together speaking about the effect these proposed tariffs would have on our local economy and on Michigan’s economy. He recognized that if there was a closure of Algoma in Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan would immediately be forced into a recession. His efforts to ensure that did not happen, for both our mutual benefits have been substantial and are much appreciated," Romano said.
By law, President Trump's steel tariffs needed to be described as a national security matter.
A provision in a 1962 U.S. law allows the president to set emergency tariffs as a security issue.
Canada is the No. 1 seller of both steel and aluminum to the United States.
Full-court diplomatic press
The fact that Canada might be included on the initial hit list had become a political sore spot for the administration.
A full-court diplomatic press unfolded in recent days, with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau calling Trump earlier this week, and then speaking Thursday with the Republican leaders of both the House of Representatives and the Senate.
Canada's ambassador to Washington dined this week with U.S. national-security adviser H.R. McMaster.
Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland, Natural Resources Minister Jim Carr, Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan, and Transport Minister Marc Garneau all reached out to cabinet counterparts in recent days.
The lobbying found a mostly receptive audience: the U.S. military strongly resisted tariffs against allies, and 107 congressional Republicans released a letter this week to express their alarm over the move.
United Steelworkers
The United Steelworkers joined the call today for permanent exemptions for Canadian steel and aluminum.
"Canadian steel and aluminum exports are not part of the problem that the U.S. administration is trying to address through its tariff measures," said USW National Director Ken Neumann.
"We are relieved by the temporary exemption, to the extent that it recognizes Canada is not the problem," Neumann said.
"But a temporary exemption creates considerable economic uncertainty for Canadian producers and will be counter-productive to making progress in the NAFTA renegotiations. That's why the exemption must be permanent."
"The U.S. government launched an investigation into steel and aluminum imports to respond to countries whose trade practices represent a threat to American national security," Neumann said.
Marty Warren, Steelworkers director for Ontario and Atlantic Canada, added: "The evidence confirms there are many countries that engage in unfair, illegal and predatory trading practices that have created a global steel glut and depressed prices affecting all steel and aluminum markets."
"These 'bad actor' countries, including China, Egypt, India, Malaysia, Korea, Russia, Turkey and Vietnam, have harmed the entire North American market. Canada is not one of these bad actors," Warren said.
"The federal government must be prepared to use all measures at its disposal, including targeted safeguard actions, government-initiated trade cases and increasing resources to the Canada Border Services Agency to investigate and respond to increased dumping of product into the Canadian market," said Neumann.