Re: Provenzano argues steel plant status won’t sully Sault’s case for ferrochrome processing plant-mining giant

HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

Ringer

Rank: President [?]

Points: 16773 [?]

Votes: 73 Score: 3.7 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Re: Provenzano argues steel plant status won’t sully Sault’s case for ferrochrome processing plant-mining giant

in response to

Provenzano argues steel plant status won’t sully Sault’s case for ferrochrome processing plant

Ringer

posted on Nov 07, 2017 07:42PM

The city, and three other communities, were formally approached by Noront and asked to make a compelling case to host the plant and show the Canadian-based mining giant that it can meet Noront’s requirements

Hehe missed the 'mining giant' whose SP is .28 in the first read......priceless.

Hang in there and GLTA

Ringer

7 Recommendations

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

Please to post a reply