Re: OT: Palladium Costs More Than Platinum for the First Time Since 2001

HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

Edgy

Rank: President [?]

Points: 38290 [?]

Votes: 354 Score: 3.3 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Re: OT: Palladium Costs More Than Platinum for the First Time Since 2001

in response to

Re: OT: Palladium Costs More Than Platinum for the First Time Since 2001

hoov

posted on Oct 01, 2017 12:01PM

"That's one of the reasons Noront's projected cost per lb for nickel is so low"

To repeat there are also copper benefits, resulting in negative costs to nickel. Any wonder some on this forum cheer so loud about Eagle's ore that it is ear defening? So be kind and forgive them for doing so.

;-) Ed.

p.s. Just do not be so forgiving about those that delay our road to the Ring.

2 Recommendations

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

Please to post a reply