HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: Stalemate?
7
May 12, 2015 07:26AM
4
May 12, 2015 10:57AM
3
May 12, 2015 11:17AM
14
May 12, 2015 12:30PM
4
May 12, 2015 12:37PM
7
May 12, 2015 01:12PM
11
May 12, 2015 11:11PM
5
May 13, 2015 12:04AM
6
May 13, 2015 06:15AM
6
May 13, 2015 06:46AM
12
May 13, 2015 08:39AM
16
May 13, 2015 01:07PM

You've made some good points - I'll add, the crown is represented by however jurisdiction over certain things has been split amongst Canadian Federalism, where provinces as you say have jurisdiction over certain things like education and healthcare.

Also there are the Natural resources = province. I assumed that this is what we've been talking about this whole time...

And I'll say it again - not all treaties are the same and Ontario was a signatory to Treaty 9!

The modern treaties in BC are negotiated by Canada and the province as another example.

The old treaties are typically not being "renegotiated" as such in mining talks and so that's why I say that the Feds don't actually need to be at the table. Look at agreements with other provinces such as Alberta and Sask. where the Feds aren't a factor with FN natural resource deals at all. The provinces just consult and pay up once agreement is had. Sask is actually a great example for "getting it right."

If we make this about the treaties overall with the Feds, then FNs turn the conversation away from a natural resources sharing negotiation into something much more complicated.

For all of our sake, let's stay focused on the immediate deal at hand and what it means to have reasonable accommodation for FNs in this repect.

15
May 13, 2015 10:40PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply