HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Not one mention of Noront by Financial post.

I've got 3 links for you to look at below. But before you do ..consider this:

THE STAR, put out a story on Feb 21, 2014 - "Toronto miner Noront ready and raring to go while competitor Cliffs in mothballing mode..."

...and yet, today, ..from National post..in the article below ..not one mention of Noront and their progress. No mention of the fact they are the only mining company in the ROF that has submitted an EA and are the farthest ahead in the ROF. Ask yourself "why?"

Take a closer look at the Financial Post. Financial post's parent is the National Post.

The National Post is owned by Post Media Inc.

Take a look at the lovely USA hedge fund that bought a 19% stake in Post Media last November 2013. Look at the link below.

My favorite "lines" were :

Postmedia chief financial officer Doug Lamb told the Post in an article published Friday that Silver Point had expressed an interest before making the purchase but didn’t disclose the fund’s exact plans.

An Oct. 10 filing with Canadian regulators says Silver Point acquired the securities “for investment purposes only and not with a view to influencing the control or direction of Postmedia.”

Hmm,,..not with a view to "influence or control the direction....."

Sure ....Sure..

Now, this Sliver Point Capital..who is this hedge fund? Link provided below for that too. (It was formed in 2002 by former Goldman Sachs employees Edward A. Mule and Robert J. O’Shea)

But before you proceed to the 3 links below....Look at this link from Aug, 12, 2013..

http://business.financialpost.com/2013/08/12/northern-promise-ring-of-fire-smoulders-anew/?__lsa=447b-6dbb

Notice Noront's name mentioned??????? It's interesting ..now....after the Goldman Sachs run hedge fund bought 19% ........the name Noront ....doesn't appear....anyone believe "they" don't want to influence or control the direction??

We know why Noront is not mentioned.

http://business.financialpost.com/2014/03/04/pdac-2014-in-ring-of-fire-cliffs-remains-elephant-in-the-room/

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/silver-point-capital-buys-19-stake-in-postmedia/article15208371/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silver_Point_Capital

PDAC 2014: In Ring of Fire, Cliffs remains elephant in the room

Peter Koven | March 4, 2014 | Last Updated: Mar 4 5:56 PM ET
More from Peter Koven

Peter J. Thompson/National PostThe PDAC mining conference at Toronto's Metro Toronto Convention Centre.

TORONTO – In Northern Ontario’s Ring of Fire, Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. remains the elephant in the room that no one wants to talk about.

A Tuesday lunch panel at the Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada (PDAC) convention focused on the giant undeveloped deposit in the James Bay Lowlands and what has to be done to move it forward.

There were some encouraging comments in that regard from former premier Bob Rae, who is representing the Matawa Tribal Council in its negotiations with the province over Ring of Fire development. He said the two sides are “making good progress at the bargaining table,” and he is optimistic that they will reach a framework agreement soon. That is good news for all involved.

But the panel largely ignored the broader questions investors have about the Ring of Fire: Does it make economic sense for a major mining company to invest the capital required for this highly remote project? And do any of them want to?

Those concerns came to the forefront last November, when Cliffs suspended all work on its Chromite project in the Ring. Some analysts said this was a smart move given the high risk and potentially low returns associated with the project.

The PDAC panel chose not to address this. Apart from being mentioned once in passing, the word “Cliffs” never crossed the mouths of any of the speakers.

<a href="http://ad.ca.doubleclick.net/N3081/jump/fpo_news/news/mining/story/;loc=mid;sz=300x250;tile=6;blog=mining;nk=print;pr=fp;ck=news;sck=mining;aid=419039102;author=Peter-Koven;tag=cliffs-natural-resources-inc;tag=pdac-2014;page=story;!c=iframe;ord=815566?" target="_blank"> <img src="http://ad.ca.doubleclick.net/N3081/ad/fpo_news/news/mining/story/;loc=mid;sz=300x250;tile=6;blog=mining;nk=print;pr=fp;ck=news;sck=mining;aid=419039102;author=Peter-Koven;tag=cliffs-natural-resources-inc;tag=pdac-2014;page=story;!c=iframe;ord=815566?" /> </a>  Yet Cliffs is the only senior company to take a serious interest in the Ring of Fire. Without Cliffs, the Ring is full of nothing but small juniors poorly equipped to tackle such a remote, high-risk project.

Mr. Rae was the one speaker who addressed the question of whether a large mining company can generate a decent return from the Ring of Fire. He pointed out that financing is a major challenge, and there are concerns across the sector that mega-projects are not viable right now. He said he has heard plenty of “business realism” in his conversations at the PDAC conference.

“If you look at the decisions boards of directors of major companies have made, they’ve been very clear that these huge mega-projects have to be thought through,” he told reporters.

The Ontario government hopes senior miners will take a greater interest in the Ring of Fire once critical questions around infrastructure and First Nations agreements are resolved. Those issues are taking a very long time to work through, but the government maintains progress is being made.

Panelist Josh Hjartarson, vice-president of policy and government relations at the Ontario Chamber of Commerce, said there was urgency to get moving quickly with development of the Ring of Fire. He noted Ontario is facing challenging economic times and that the project would bring critical benefits.

Last month, his chamber released a study that suggested the project would generate up to $9.4-billion of GDP in its first 10 years of operations, and more than $25-billion over 32 years.

“Let’s move. Let’s get going. Prudently. But let’s get going,” he said.

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply