E/W road cap cost =$438M; N/W cap cost = $ 1,050M fyi
posted on
Dec 24, 2013 12:22PM
NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)
Possible road financing requirements $500M ??
- hard to copy complete tables, sorry
Peter
4.10-1 summarizes the key facts of each alternative.
Table 4.10—1 Key Facts - All-Season Road Alternatives
Component North-South Alternative East-West Alternative
Total Length of road construction (km) 3201
282
Total number of water crossings 1002
913
Number of major river crossings
Ogoki River
Albany River
Attawapiskat River
None
Number of communities potentially
serviced 0 4
Comment on available aggregate for road
construction
Greater potential availability of
aggregate, due to presence of
esker deposits. In some
locations this esker material
may not be suitable for top
coat of road, which will
increase costs.
Reduced availability of
aggregate relative to
alternative. This will lead to
higher aggregate costs.
Existing winter or all-season roads to
support construction (km) 60 km of existing forestry road 200 km of existing winter road
Construction through wetland Similar to other alternative Similar to other alternative
Impact on caribou habitat
Much of road alignment is
through areas deemed good
habitat for caribou. Eskers
are preferred habitat for
wildlife mammals in the
wetland.
Much of the road passes
through fewer areas deemed
good caribou habitat and
follows an existing linear
disturbance (winter road).
Relative cost
Expected to be higher than
the alternative, due to greater
number of major water
crossings. These costs are
partially offset by a shorter
overall distance of new road
construction and relative
greater availability of
aggregate.
Expected to be lower than
other alternative, due to fewer
major bridges.
Provincial waterway parks intersected
Ogoki River, Albany River and
Otoskwin/Attawapiskat River
Provincial Parks.
None
Relative First Nation support
Chief of Neskantaga First
Nation has been outspoken
against this option.
Several First Nations support
this alternative; no major
opposition has been recorded.
NOTES:
1. THE 320 KM NORTH-SOUTH ROUTE WAS PROPOSED BY CLIFFS NATURAL RESOURCES AND INCLUDES
260 KM OF NEW ROAD CONSTRUCTION AND THE UPGRADING OF 60 KM OF EXISTING FORESTRY ROADS.
2. THE TOTAL NUMBER OF WATER CROSSINGS ON THE NORTH-SOUTH ROUTE INCLUDES APPROXIMATELY
50 CONTINUOUSLY FLOW WATERCOURSES AND 50 WETLAND AREAS (CLIFFS, 2012).
3. THE TOTAL NUMBER OF WATER CROSSINGS ON THE EAST-WEST ROUTE BASED ON FIELD INVESTIGATION.
The general alignments of the east-west transportation corridor and north-south transportation
corridor alternatives are shown on Figure 4.10-1.
4.10.4 Economic Viability of All-Season Road Alternatives
The initial desktop study of road routing alternatives (SNC-Lavalin, 2010) provided comparable
capital costs for the construction of an all-season road on the east-west and north-south corridors.
The results of this study suggested that both alternatives would be economically viable. A feasibility
level capital budget estimate for the construction of an east-west all-season road from the Pickle
Lake North Road to the mine site was developed based on preliminary engineering and quantities,
geotechnical input, constructability and logistics (Nuna Logistics, 2012b). The capital budget
estimates did not integrate information from field geotechnical investigations to confirm aggregate
and borrow source locations, and subsurface conditions along the road or at proposed bridge
locations. The capital budget estimate for the construction of an east-west road was $437,882,020
(+25 % / -10 %) and was considered to be economically viable.
A rail vs. road trade-off study was completed for KWG Resources Ltd., Canada Chrome Corporation
in 2013 (Tetra Tech, 2013). The report provided an economic trade-off study for a rail and road
option along a 330 km north-south alignment from Nakina to near the mine site. The study
concluded that the road was the preferred option. The direct and non-direct capital costs for thconstruction of an all-season north-south road were estimated to be $1,050,000,000. The lower
estimated cost of constructing an east-west road is preferred.