http://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=treaty%20number%209%2C%20surrender%20of%20land&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CC4QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.canadiancrown.com%2Fuploads%2F3%2F8%2F4%2F1%2F3841927%2Ftreaty_no.9.pdf&ei=34wSUcb4CMLi0QHd7oHwCA&usg=AFQjCNGhm3k6dYebE0cMuhWQU-pSW8h3vw&bvm=bv.41934586,d.dmg

The link above is a 15 minute read of treaty #9. If you missed surrender of land the first time.....you'll see it 21 more times. No where does it mention revenue sharing.

The treaty is pretty clear. In the case of De Beers which gave 350 million to Attawapiskat not to mention the mobile homes they provided when fake hunger Artist Chief Spence called in media to show native living in tents in the cold ..while she sat with 9 million dollars in a stock portfolio.....was very nice and Generous of De Beers. In NO WAY a treaty requirement. And De Beers, in their generousity gets rewarded with disruption. Where are the police????

Big companies should be using their clout in the halls of power to lobby for a pro Crown sovereignty stance on the part of government and senior bureaucracy- and police.

Aboriginals in Canada make up less than 5% of the population...blockades void treaties.

It's time the voting tax paying public stood up and demanded justice from elected officials.

I still remember this the Matawa eviction notice...is Matawa aware of what is written in treaty number 9. Surrender of Land. The gov't provides cash to the reserves to meet with the education obligations in treaty 9. If this money is not spent in the way it is intended ie: squandered...it's not the gov't fault. I suggest reading treaty 9 .

http://wawataynews.ca/archive/all/2012/6/28/matawa-first-nations-pledge-put-brakes-ring-fire_23056