HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: ONTC divestment info(Edgy a-1)
10
Nov 13, 2012 09:27AM
17
Nov 13, 2012 12:50PM
5
Nov 13, 2012 03:51PM
9
Nov 13, 2012 04:32PM
10
Nov 13, 2012 10:43PM
1
Nov 14, 2012 06:52AM
5
Nov 14, 2012 06:54AM
3
Nov 14, 2012 09:16AM

My guess is surface Excavation rights are probably not same as Surface rights. At least not to the same extent.
Basicly they own the gravel but not necessarily the surface much along a mineral claim would give one except that the matter of interest is at or close to the surface.

If I have some gravel on my property or even a valuable mineral, is it actually mine?
Or if I have a farm field under which there might be oil, does an oil company have equal surface rights on that property to mine? I think I have priority and must be compensated IF trespassed upon.

Again, I am most interested how the legal system looks on all this.

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply