Ingrid It's been awhile since we last spoke. It is my understanding that there will be two feasibility studies; one an updated Ni/PGM centric bankable feasibility and the other an initial bankable feasibility study for Cr which would include off -take revenues and infastructures revenue sharing synergies with partner(s). Am I correct in this assumption? It would seem to me that as long as foreign ownership of a strategic metal/resource stays with a minority owner(s)(bao-CHN ) and US in non control positions; and given recent CHN most favoured nation status (same as us)under under nafta , that national security reason would be used to ensure the BOA minority position AND preclude any 100% takeover attempt. What do you think ? Best, Peter