Al: I think your back of the envelope conclusions are largely correct: a minimum doubling- up to 3.5 times larger Eagle(s) resource. Makes this a top three in world size (vms) in past decade. I would think that by Wes/Paul calculating both e/w AND n/s feasibly plan costs, NOT could select/agree to the n/s route and make up the difference through $ consessions from CLFF. $ concessions such as Garanteed Cr offtake (tons&price); use of smelter; etc Maybe Strato/Ken or others could take a crack at the size of Eagles Ni resource calculation?? Peter