HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: New Presentation "buying" FNC claims
10
JDR
Apr 03, 2012 10:13PM
10
Apr 03, 2012 11:11PM
11
Apr 03, 2012 11:31PM
5
Apr 03, 2012 11:56PM
5
Apr 04, 2012 07:38AM
10
Apr 04, 2012 09:57AM
31
Apr 04, 2012 10:05AM
8
Apr 04, 2012 10:29AM
1
Apr 04, 2012 10:34AM
8
Apr 04, 2012 10:46AM
9
Apr 04, 2012 10:57AM
1
Apr 04, 2012 12:28PM
2
Apr 04, 2012 02:53PM
1
Apr 04, 2012 02:56PM
9
Apr 04, 2012 03:34PM

As I understand it, through a claim one has a right to what is IN the ground but the surface has to be bought as any other surface property to control it.

Also one can not buy all the property around someone else's and deny him access.
Right to access is basic to all surface agreements. I have no experiance with land but being a former sports fisherman, at least it was so in Ontario, one can not buy all the land around a lake and deny fishing access. To deny fishing in such a lake one had to buy all the land under the lake or having bought the land first afterwards created the lake via a dam on it.

This applies more to the staked north-south rail line route. Those claims have little influence on the rail line path except that they may control access to and use of any gravel or other construction materials that may be needed.

16
Apr 05, 2012 01:20AM
1
Apr 05, 2012 09:52AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply