It's a study to read a posters writings and try to discover what it is they are stating both directly and indirectly. Take Hoov for example. He is a scientist and has been schooled in the scientific approach which attempts to deal purely with the facts as much as possible, with a pedagogical approach or method taking him through a series of steps to ascertain that which is most probable based on the facts. Consequently, you'll find that he speaks very little on the speculative, though he may have his own thoughts on this, which is partially why he doesn't post as much as he has before. When he has the facts then he gives an opinion.

Then there are the speculators who try to come up with theories based on the indirect. Babjack is our best example in this regard, in my opinion. She researches all of the connections of the entities involved and tries to ascertain what positions or advantages may be gained by their interconnections. Very speculative, but quite often very telling. She should be in law enforcement. We'll send her to the ROF instead of the ROF co-ordinator.

There are of course those who are a mix of the first two or who offer perhaps a little less of the science and substitute that with business accumen and provide great offerings to our site and I look forward to their every post. Then there are the observers who take the info. provided by the above and contribute some very interesting thinking and perspective.

Then there are the others.....

Watch for the response.