HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Mining Watch - a must read!

I agree that "anything is possible". What is incomprehensible is why would Xstrata pay megabucks now for control of an asset they could have easily outbid CLF for way back ? If you look at historic posts around the time of the FWR bidding, you will see this issue discussed a number of times.

I will certainly allow for the theoretical but somewhat paranoid possibility that X said to CLF "We won't bid, you get it cheap, and we make a deal later" . But not a chance of this in the real world. Let's face the reality, X is dominated by operators and financial risk managers, some of the best in major mining. But they would need absolutely everything , including construction and offtake marketing , risk managed to the nth before a final capital commitment. CLF is far more nimble and entrepreneurial and saw great future leverage in the control of the cr that ,IMHO, Xstrata simply missed or ignored.

I also believe Ontario, as mining friendly a jurisdiction as it is, would present serious complexities for Xstrata , not the least of which would be FN relationships.

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply